This combination Condaliopsis obtusifolia var. canescens has not been published anywhere. The basionym Condalia divaricata is placed as Condaliopsis divaricata according to the reference on which this exchange is based.
Nesom, G. L. (2023). Ziziphus segregates in the USA and Mexico, including Sarcomphalus, Condaliopsis , and Conalma, gen. Nov. (Rhamnaceae). Phytoneuron, 2023(34), 1-132. (Link)
@oscargsol thanks for your work on this. FYI, this swap, made without also splitting C. obtusifolia s.l., has thrown what appears to be several hundred observations back up to genus level because IDs of C. obtusifolia s.l. now conflict with new IDs of C. divaricata. For example, my observation here: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/192037325 (this one is easy to fix when I update my ID but there appear to be 300+ observations, perhaps more, similarly affected).
I know, I realized it would be a problem to do so, but finding that a non-existent subspecies had previously been created by a previous taxonomic change seemed to me to be a greater problem than what would result from this change.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
@oscargsol thanks for your work on this. FYI, this swap, made without also splitting C. obtusifolia s.l., has thrown what appears to be several hundred observations back up to genus level because IDs of C. obtusifolia s.l. now conflict with new IDs of C. divaricata. For example, my observation here: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/192037325 (this one is easy to fix when I update my ID but there appear to be 300+ observations, perhaps more, similarly affected).