Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of Sula. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Sula leucogaster 3797
"Split polytypic Cocos Booby Sula brewsteri, from the Pacific coast of North and South America (including etesiaca breeding from Central America to Colombia) from Brown Booby Sula leucogaster, which thus has two subspecies: nominate which occurs in the tropical Atlantic, Caribbean, and Gulf of Mexico; and S. l. plotus of the central Pacific."
@birdwhisperer@rjq Atlasing this split automatically assigns ~100 obs to Sula brewsteri, but kicks back ~120 to Sula, including some that are unambiguously S. leucogaster (Atlantic, Indian and West Pacific occurrences).
What do you think?
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
@birdwhisperer @rjq
Atlasing this split automatically assigns ~100 obs to Sula brewsteri, but kicks back ~120 to Sula, including some that are unambiguously S. leucogaster (Atlantic, Indian and West Pacific occurrences).
What do you think?