Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of Anemoneae. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Anemone 51242
This taxon split of Anemone follows the recent revisions of Anemone s. l., by Mosyakin et al. and others. Many of the genera are already well known such as Hepatica or Pulsatilla.
Knowltonia is group that has its distribution mainly in the southern hemisphere, but some species are found as far north as Mexico.
Anemonoides is a genus where many rhizomatous woodland species like Anemone nemorosa can be found.
Eriocapitella is the genus that was erected for the well known and often cultivated Japanese/Chinese Anemones and related species.
I agree with the taxon split in general, but Omalocarpus is in the family Sapindaceae and Keiskea is also a synonym of the genus Collinsonia (Lamiaceae)
"If some or all of the outputs lack atlases, or if atlases overlap for a given record, identifications will be replaced with identifications of the nearest common ancestor taxon. "
-> that sounds like it could create a taxonomic chaos...
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
I agree with the taxon split in general, but Omalocarpus is in the family Sapindaceae and Keiskea is also a synonym of the genus Collinsonia (Lamiaceae)
"If some or all of the outputs lack atlases, or if atlases overlap for a given record, identifications will be replaced with identifications of the nearest common ancestor taxon. "
-> that sounds like it could create a taxonomic chaos...